Which statement best describes a peremptory challenge?

Which statement best describes a peremptory challenge?

• A. A challenge that arises when a juror is dismissed for a stated reason.
• B. Dismisses a juror from further consideration without the challenging attorney having to tell the court the reason behind that decision.
• C. A challenge based on a juror's bias or relationship that must be shown for cause.
• D. A challenge that causes a mistrial.

Answer: (B)

Peremptory challenges let a party remove a potential juror from serving on the case without having to explain or justify the decision to the court. This is different from a challenge for cause, where you must demonstrate a bias or other disqualifying factor and substantiate it for the judge. The statement that a juror is dismissed for a stated reason describes a for-cause challenge, not a peremptory one. The idea that a challenge depends on showing bias or a relationship for cause also aligns with for-cause, not peremptory. And a mistrial is a separate outcome that can occur for various legal reasons, not a consequence of using a peremptory challenge. So the description that matches a peremptory challenge is removing a juror from consideration without giving a reason.

Peremptory challenges let a party remove a potential juror from serving on the case without having to explain or justify the decision to the court. This is different from a challenge for cause, where you must demonstrate a bias or other disqualifying factor and substantiate it for the judge. The statement that a juror is dismissed for a stated reason describes a for-cause challenge, not a peremptory one. The idea that a challenge depends on showing bias or a relationship for cause also aligns with for-cause, not peremptory. And a mistrial is a separate outcome that can occur for various legal reasons, not a consequence of using a peremptory challenge. So the description that matches a peremptory challenge is removing a juror from consideration without giving a reason.